Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9338ff3 and 7e1e15d.

• src/utils/converter.ts (4 hunks)
• test/scenarios/mappings/data.ts (3 hunks)
• test/scenarios/mappings/object_mappings.json (1 hunks)

test/scenarios/mappings/object_mappings.json (2)

13-17: LGTM: Root level mapping follows established pattern.

The new root level mapping from $.traits3 to $.properties3 maintains consistency with existing mapping patterns and provides the foundation for nested property mappings.

---

18-28: Verify mapping order and completeness.

The child property mappings look correct, but let's ensure:

1. The order of mappings won't affect the transformation (e.g., root mapping vs. nested properties)
2. All required child properties are mapped (noticed category in input but no corresponding mapping)

Let's check for any missing property mappings:

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for test cases or input data to understand the complete structure of traits3 object.

---

Let me try a different approach to find the test data by looking at the entire object_mappings.json file.

---

Mapping order and completeness verified

The mappings are correctly ordered from root to nested properties:

1. Root mapping: $.traits3 → $.properties3
2. Direct property: $.traits3.display_name → $.properties3.name
3. Nested object: $.traits3.custom_properties → $.properties3.custom
4. Deep nested property: $.traits3.custom_properties.bar → $.properties3.custom.foo

Regarding the category property mentioned in the review: there's no evidence in the test files of its existence or requirement. The mappings appear complete based on the available context.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any input properties mentioned in test files that might need mapping

# Look for traits3 related test cases or example inputs
rg -A 5 "traits3" --type json

# Look for properties3 related test cases or expected outputs
rg -A 5 "properties3" --type json

Length of output: 2098

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases or input data containing traits3 structure
rg -B 5 -A 10 '"traits3":' --type json

# Also search for any test assertions or expected output containing properties3
rg -B 5 -A 10 '"properties3":' --type json

Length of output: 85

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete content of the mappings file
cat test/scenarios/mappings/object_mappings.json

# Also search for any test files that might use these mappings
fd -e json -e js -x grep -l "traits3\|properties3" {}

Length of output: 705

test/scenarios/mappings/data.ts (2)

354-362: LGTM! Output structure maintains consistency with existing patterns.

The output structure correctly wraps the input in a value object, maintaining consistency with other trait mappings in the test suite.

---

322-328: LGTM! Test input structure validates nested object mappings.

The test input appropriately validates object mappings with child properties through a nested structure containing both direct properties (display_name, category) and a nested object (custom_properties).

Let's verify the test coverage of nested mappings:

✅ Verification successful

Test input provides comprehensive coverage of nested object mappings

The search results confirm that the test file contains multiple test cases covering various nested object scenarios:

• Simple nested objects (properties, traits with basic key-value pairs)
• Complex nested structures (properties1, traits1 with nested value objects)
• Array of nested objects (traits2)
• Objects with custom properties (traits3, properties3 with custom_properties)

The new test case (traits3) complements existing scenarios by testing a different nesting pattern, ensuring thorough coverage of object mappings with child properties.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other test cases with similar nested structures
rg -U "custom_properties:.*\{.*\}" test/

Length of output: 42

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for nested object patterns in test data
rg -U "properties.*:.*\{" test/scenarios/mappings/data.ts -A 3

# Also search for similar trait definitions
rg -U "traits.*:.*\{" test/scenarios/mappings/data.ts -A 3

Length of output: 1515

src/utils/converter.ts (3)

19-23: LGTM: Clean implementation of optional props parameter.

The updated function signature with default empty array provides good flexibility for object creation while maintaining backward compatibility.

---

425-425: LGTM: Consistent use of new spread helper.

The change maintains consistency with the new approach for handling object properties using spread syntax.

---

239-245: LGTM: Clear and reusable selector validation.

Good extraction of the selector validation logic into a reusable function, improving code maintainability.